Qdrant vs Milvus: Which Is More Actively Maintained? Live GitHub Data
Qdrant and Milvus are two open-source vector databases used for semantic search and RAG. This page compares how actively each one is maintained, using live data from GitHub.
GitHub data checked 19 minutes ago.
Side by side
| Measure | Qdrant | Milvus |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Active |
| Commits, last 91 days | 709 | 651 |
| Same 91 days a year earlier | 347 | 551 |
| Change vs last year | +104% | +18% |
| Last commit | 18 Oct 2026 | 18 Oct 2026 |
| GitHub stars | 35,128 | 46,417 |
| Stars gained, daily snapshots | +27 in 2 days | +17 in 2 days |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Managed cloud | Not checked | Not checked |
| Visitor rating | —0 of 3 ratings needed | —0 of 3 ratings needed |
What the numbers say
In the last 91 days, Qdrant’s default branch received 709 commits and Milvus’s received 651. The two are within a similar range. Against the same 91 days a year earlier, Qdrant is at +104% and Milvus at +18%. The index labels both “active”. Qdrant has 35,128 GitHub stars and Milvus has 46,417; stars show how many people bookmarked a project, not how many use it.
What this comparison does not tell you
These are maintenance signals only. They do not measure speed, output quality, features, documentation or how easy either tool is to run, and we have not benchmarked either tool for this page. A quiet repository can still be a good fit for a stable job, and a busy one can still break between releases. Use the numbers to decide what to check next, not which tool is better.
Each tool’s full record
Related comparisons
How this is measured: commits on each repository’s default branch counted through the GitHub API, the last 91 days against the same 91 days a year earlier; stars, licence and archived flag from the repository; README checked daily for maintenance notices. Visitor ratings come from visitors to each tool’s page, not from EvalAITools.